The Friends will, if it thinks appropriate, respond to consultation documents from any body or Planning Authority on issues that could impinge upon the policy of the National Park. Whilst we generally do not interfere with individual planning applications, if considered to have a wider impact on policy affecting the National Park as a whole, we may also consider lodging an objection. The Friends’ responses are below, in date order of response with the latest at the top.
4th January 2018: FPCNP have responded to the Pre-application Consultation for land to the west of Glasfryn Rd, St Davids. The proposed use includes new housing and a Premier Inn. You can see the proposal at the external website www.glasfrynroadplans.co.uk.
Read the FPCNP response here.
24Medi,,en,Cadeirydd y Cyfeillion yn cyflwyno datganiad pellach ar ran aelodau,,en,cefnogi cadw'r cyfleuster gan APC gyda chefnogaeth gwirfoddolwyr,,en,I weld copi llawn o'r llythyr,,en,cliciwch yma,,en,Mae dyfodol Casnewydd Canolfan Groeso Parc Cenedlaethol,,en,canolfan wybodaeth parc cenedlaethol newport dyfodol,,en,Medi,,en,Cadeirydd y Cyfeillion yn cyflwyno datganiad pellach ar ran aelodau,,en,cefnogi cadw'r cyfleuster gan APC gyda chefnogaeth gwirfoddolwyr,,en,I weld copi llawn o'r llythyr,,en,cliciwch yma,,en 2017: The Chairman of the Friends submits a further statement on behalf of members, supporting the retention of the facility by the NPA with volunteer support. To see a full copy of the letter, click here.
The response makes some observations on the two most likely routes (option 3b, a viaduct behind the existing road, and option J, around the valley further inland) and expresses a preference for option J. The full response is here.
The response on behalf of the Friends supports the ambition to restore and regenerate Blackpool Mill and its immediate environment, but concludes that the impact on the wider landscape, and effects of associated traffic and transport, would adversely affect the quality and special character of the National Park. Read the full response here.